|
|
Post by swfwebmaster on Oct 27, 2008 19:54:39 GMT 1
Your vote will assist in determining our =SWF= Server setting for friendly fire damage.
This is when one BF2 player accidently shoots another friendly fighter. This does NOT include Mines (Anti-tank or claymores) which will only detonate for enemy forces.
|
|
|
|
Post by angrytomass on Oct 28, 2008 9:18:25 GMT 1
Well My view is that friendly fire should be off, (No Damage if you shoot a friendly).
However I personally feel that AT mines and Clays should be on and detonate on friendly as well, this would resolve the Clay on flag issue.
|
|
|
|
Post by brusingbruno on Oct 28, 2008 12:05:17 GMT 1
How the hell else is a sniper supposed to get points Angry? That is what good sniper would do! Wait for people to get on the flag because the usually dont move why cant he get a couple more points! And if you dont like clays on flags have somebody who is oblivious run in before you and you can get some revive points. Simple as that!
|
|
|
|
Post by angrytomass on Oct 28, 2008 12:16:14 GMT 1
Well a snipers weapon is his gun, so I would say a good sniper should be able to get points through shooting people.
A claymore is meant to be used to defend a snipers position, not as an offensive weapon.
Having said that the game is not real life hence I belive that if you can use a flaw in the game to your advantage then do so. (bunny hopping for example)
So although i do not have a major issue with clays on flags I do belive that if the clays killed your own as well then it would reduce the amount of idiots that run around putting clays everywhere without any thought.
|
|
|
|
Post by robnobrobnob on Oct 28, 2008 12:58:54 GMT 1
I do angree with Bruno in this instance but only because i enjoy playing as a sniper and like bruno says you dont get points unless you can use your clays, clays being left on flags in a defence i think in the fact that it stops the enemy from caping the flag thus making it a defence rather than an offence in my opinion. but that is what this vote is for, we are not all going to agree on every think!!
|
|
|
|
Post by angrytomass on Oct 28, 2008 15:48:24 GMT 1
Well this vote is for friendly fire damage, so it doesnt include Mines and clays etc.
But im fine with anything really.
|
|
|
|
Post by sfscriv on Oct 28, 2008 18:54:40 GMT 1
I think 100% is too harsh. It also makes it too easy for unruly players to make intentional team kills.
I feel strongly there should be some penalty for shooting a buddy. There should be discipline/control of fires. A lack of control over fires should be penalized.
|
|
|
|
Post by angrytomass on Oct 28, 2008 19:27:20 GMT 1
Yeah I did like the 40% thing.
We should do that again.
|
|
|
|
Post by brusingbruno on Oct 28, 2008 20:26:24 GMT 1
but have it turned off for clays and mines
|
|
|
|
Post by psyco6 on Oct 29, 2008 17:32:55 GMT 1
100% damage will teach situational awarness muzzle disipline.I can't stand it if I'm support/ground defense.And I'm surpressing a flag and a player will run right in front of my muzzle because of FF on, bad habit.I like it off for everything just have the option to forgive/punish.
|
|
|
|
Post by robnobrobnob on Oct 29, 2008 18:00:21 GMT 1
I have changed my answer to 40% because people are idiots when they can shoot each other, and it will stop C4 jumping which i hate!! As long as mines and clays dont go off on friendlys im happy!!
|
|
